United States v. Liberto

CourtCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit
DecidedApril 22, 2003
Docket02-4692
StatusUnpublished

This text of United States v. Liberto (United States v. Liberto) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
United States v. Liberto, (4th Cir. 2003).

Opinion

UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 02-4692

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

Plaintiff - Appellee,

versus

JOHN MICHAEL LIBERTO,

Defendant - Appellant.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Northern District of West Virginia, at Wheeling. Frederick P. Stamp, Jr., District Judge. (CR-97-46-5)

Submitted: April 17, 2003 Decided: April 22, 2003

Before WIDENER, WILLIAMS, and MOTZ, Circuit Judges.

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Stephen D. Herndon, Wheeling, West Virginia, for Appellant. Thomas E. Johnston, United States Attorney, David J. Perri, Assistant United States Attorney, Wheeling, West Virginia, for Appellee.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. See Local Rule 36(c). PER CURIAM:

John Michael Liberto appeals the district court’s order

revoking his supervised release and imposing a nine month term of

imprisonment, to be followed by twenty-seven months of supervised

release. Liberto asserts the district court abused its discretion

by revoking his supervised release for failure to meet the

conditions of his release because his failures were not volitional.

We have reviewed the record and find no abuse of discretion. We

also find the district court complied with 18 U.S.C. § 3583(e)(3)

(2000), in its revocation of Liberto’s supervised release.

Accordingly, we affirm the judgment of the district court. We

dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions

are adequately presented in the materials before the court and

argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
United States v. Liberto, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/united-states-v-liberto-ca4-2003.