United States v. Lias

103 F. Supp. 341, 41 A.F.T.R. (P-H) 953, 1952 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 4483
CourtDistrict Court, N.D. West Virginia
DecidedMarch 3, 1952
DocketCiv. A. No. 565
StatusPublished
Cited by9 cases

This text of 103 F. Supp. 341 (United States v. Lias) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court, N.D. West Virginia primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
United States v. Lias, 103 F. Supp. 341, 41 A.F.T.R. (P-H) 953, 1952 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 4483 (N.D.W. Va. 1952).

Opinion

WATKINS, District Judge.

This is an action brought by the United States'to foreclose liens for income taxes for the years 1942 to 1947, inclusive, assessed and outstanding against William G. Lias in the total sum of $2,442,944.61, plus interest (including assessed interest and penalties); against Automatic Cigarette Sales Corporation for income, declared value excess profits, and excess profits taxes for 1944, in the amount of $176,455.42, plus interest; and against Zeller’s Steak House, Inc., for the fiscal years ended June 30, 1943 to June 30, 1946, inclusive, income, declared value excess profits, and excess profits taxes, in the amount of $124, 795.73, plus interest. In this proceeding to foreclose its liens the United States has made a motion for the appointment of a receiver, and upon this motion for the appointment of receivers a hearing was had. There are two issues now to be decided: (1) Is the United States entitled to have a receiver appointed to enforce its liens with all the powers of a receiver in equity as to the assets of William G. Lias, Automatic Cigarette Sales Corporation, and Zeller’s Steak House, Inc. (hereinafter referred to as taxpayers), where the Commissioner has filed a certificate as provided by statute pursuant to the provisions of Section 3678(d), Internal Revenue Code, 26 U.S.C.A. § 3678(d) ?; (2) is the United States entitled, under the unusual facts of this case to have a receiver appointed to protect and conserve the assets of other non-taxpayer corporations whose stock is alleged to be owned in whole, or a majority thereof, by the defendant William G. Lias, until such time as the ownership of such stock can be determined, where the stock owned by William G. Lias in those companies is subject to the tax liens of the United States?

Pursuant to Rule 52(a) of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure, 28 U.S.C.A., and only under the evidence in this case upon the issue of appointment of receivers, I make the following findings of fact and conclusions of law:

Findings of Fact.

1. The taxes in question were assessed by the Commissioner pursuant to law. The collector received the assessment list, and made notice and demand on the taxpayers, all prior to the institution of this suit. A tax lien was acquired by the United States under Sections 3670 'and 3671, Internal Revenue Code, 26 U.S.C.A. §§ 3670, 3671, against all property and rights of property of the taxpayers. Effort was made (and [343]*343without success) by the collector to collect the assessments here involved prior to the institution of suit.

2. Such assessments were jeopardy assessments made by the Commissioner of Internal Revenue under Section 273(a) of the Internal Revenue Code, 26 U.S.C.A. § 273(a). Following the making of the jeopardy assessments by the Commissioner, taxpayers filed a petition with the Tax Court for a redetermination of the deficiencies under Section 272(a) (1) Internal Revenue Code, 26 U.S.C.A. § 272(a) (1). The United States has filed this suit to foreclose its tax liens under Section 3678 Internal Revenue Code.

3. The Commissioner has filed a certificate under Section 3678(d) that it is in the public interest to appoint a receiver with all the powers of a receiver in equity.

4. Zeller’s Steak House is insolvent. It is an inactive corporation and no one has taken charge of its assets and affairs.

5. It will be necessary to sell and liquidate the assets of Automatic Sales Corporation, and upon such sale and liquidation it is very doubtful whether the entire tax and ■interest can be collected. The major portion of the assets of the taxpayers consist of claims against the non-taxpayer corporations. The collection of these claims is necessary in order to pay the government’s tax liens. The evidence indicates that these claims will not be collected unless a receiver is appointed to enforce collection.

6. There has been much waste and dissipation of the assets of these taxpayer companies. For example, assets of William G. Lias have been transferred to the non-taxpayer corporations. Dividends which should have been paid to Zeller’s Steak House, Inc. (now insolvent), from Market Street Club, a very profitable gambling enterprise in which William G. Lias was an alleged partner, have been diverted into Wheeling Downs, Inc., a non-taxpayer. Thereby these taxpayer defendants have either become insolvent, or so nearly so that a receiver is necesary to prevent further dissipation and waste of their assets and diversion of their assets into Wheeling Downs, Inc., Wheeling Racing Association and Laconia, Inc.

7. The non-taxpayer companies, including Wheeling Downs, Inc., Wheeling Racing Association, and Laconia, Inc., are heavily indebted to the taxpayers. Wheeling Downs, Inc., owes the taxpayers $491,-500 of which $400,000 is owing to William G. Lias. Wheeling Downs, Inc., owes La-conia, Inc., $458,767.90, and owes the Wheeling Downs Racing Association $411,-969.80 according to company records. Wheeling Downs, Inc., also owes Market Street Club $75,000. Although Wheeling Downs, Inc., owes $1,438,737.70 to other Lias enterprises, it has very little liquid assets, its chief assets consisting of a race track and improvements. Wheeling Downs, Inc., is unable to pay its indebtedness to the taxpayers such as William G. Lias, Automatic Cigarette Sales Corporation and Zeller’s Steak House, Inc., without selling, mortgaging or liquidating its permanent assets. The primary income of Wheeling Downs, Inc., consists of rentals from Wheeling Downs Racing Association. Wheeling Downs Racing Association has a five-year lease on the race track with a five-year renewal privilege. Thereby the property of Wheeling Downs, Inc., is tied up with Wheeling Downs Racing Association under that lease.

8. There is substantial evidence in the record and reasonable cause to believe that William G. Lias owns a majority of the stock in the non-taxpayer companies. Indeed, there is substantial evidence and reasonable cause to believe that he owns all of the stock in Wheeling Downs, Inc., Wheeling Downs Racing Association and La-conia, Inc., the non-taxpayer corporations. Three government revenue agents testified that William G. Lias told them that everything in the name of Alice Lias, his wife, John Lias, his brother, Mary Koutrou-manos, his mother-in-law, Gregory Kou-troumanos and William Koutroumanos, his brothers-in-law, was his, and that the corporations and partnerships “was him”, and that all the cash in the family was his and subject to use as he saw fit. This evidence is corroborated by the pencil notes of the [344]*344government’s agent Price taken at the time of the conference with Lias. Neither William G. Lias nor any of these relatives took the witness stand to deny this evidence or to testify that they were the owners of any .stock, or to give any evidence as to the circumstances under which it was purchased or the consideration for the stock transfers to them.

9. There is substantial evidence in this record and reasonable cause to believe that the transfers of stock to Lias’ relatives on November 1, 1948 were made without consideration.

10. William G. Lias admits that he and his wife own a majority of stock in all of the non-taxpayer companies. It is admitted by David Goldberg, Lias’ accountant, who testified in his behalf, that William G.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

United States v. Florida
178 F. Supp. 627 (E.D. Arkansas, 1959)
United States v. The Peelle Company
224 F.2d 667 (Second Circuit, 1955)
Lias v. Commissioner
24 T.C. 280 (U.S. Tax Court, 1955)
United States v. Peelle Co.
131 F. Supp. 341 (E.D. New York, 1955)
United States v. Lias
113 F. Supp. 502 (N.D. West Virginia, 1953)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
103 F. Supp. 341, 41 A.F.T.R. (P-H) 953, 1952 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 4483, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/united-states-v-lias-wvnd-1952.