United States v. Lewis
This text of 235 U.S. 282 (United States v. Lewis) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of the United States primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
delivered the opinion of the court.
Defendants in error were indicted for an alleged violation of the so-called Meat Inspection Law, which- is a part of the “Act making Appropriations for the Department of Agriculture,” etc., approved June 30, 1906, c. 3913, 34 Stat. pp. 669, 674, etc. Upon motion of *283 defendants the District Court quashed the indictment,, basing its decision upon the construction of the statúte, and the Government has brought this writ of error under the Criminal Appeals Act of March 2, 1907, c. 2564, 34 Stat. p. 1246.
The pertinent portions of the Meat Inspection Law are set forth in the margin. 1
*284 Pursuant to the authority conferred by the Act, the Secretary of Agriculture made certain rules and regulations, effective May 1, 1908, among which was the following:
“An official establishment may ship from the said establishment to any other official establishment any meat *285 or meat food product which has been inspected and passed under these regulations without marking the same 'Inspected and passed/ if such shipment be placed in a rail *286 road car which is sealed by an employé of the Bureau of Animal Industry, and provided that not less than 25 per cent of the contents of each car consists of meat or meat food products not marked ‘ Inspected and passed.' ” (Reg. 25, § 12, par. 1.)
The indictment charged, in substance, that defendants knowingly and wrongfully altered, defaced, broke, and destroyed a certain government seal, then being upon a certain railroad freight car containing meat and meat products then under government supervision for inspection ■and offered for transportation in interstate commerce, the seal having been affixed to the car in accordance with the rules and regulations of the Secretary of Agriculture. The clauses of the statute upon which the indictment rests are those which declare “That no person, firm, or corporation, or officer, agent, or employé thereof, shall . . . knowingly or wrongfully alter, deface, or destroy . . . any of the marks, stamps, tags, labels, or other identification devices provided for in this Act, or in and as directed by the rules and regulations prescribed hereunder by the Secretary of Agriculture, on any carcasses, parts of carcasses, or the food product, or containers thereof, subject to the provisions of this Act,” and “That any person, firm, or corporation, or any officer or agent of any such person, firm, or corporation, who shall violate any of the provisions of this Act shall be deemed guilty of a misdemeanor.”
The District Court construed the prohibition as relating alone to those engaged in the business of preparing meats for transportation, and the carrying or assisting in the carrying of such meats in interstate transportation. We are unable to discern any sufficient reason for giving to the language of the statute so limited an application. The plain object of the clause is to safeguard the food products in question against alteration or substitution, and thus enable the officials of the Government to sys *287 tematize and render effective the processes of inspection; an object that is interfered with if the tags or other identification devices are destroyed, whethei they be destroyed by those engaged in the business or by others. Moreover, one of the other prohibitions of the Act is in terms limited to those engaged in the interstate commerce of meat or meat food products.
It seems to us clear that the prohibition upon which the present indictment is founded has an effect as broad as its language, and applies to any and every “person, firm, or corporation, or officer, agent, or employé thereof.” See United States v. Portale, decided November 2, 1914, ante, p. 27.
Judgment reversed, and the cause remanded for further proceedings in accordance with this opinion.
That for the purpose of preventing the use in interstate or foreign commerce, as hereinafter provided, of meat and meat food products which are unsound, unhealthful, unwholesome, or otherwise unfit for human food, the Secretary of Agriculture . . . shall cause to be made by inspectors appointed for that purpose, as hereinafter provided, a post-mortem examination and inspection of the carcasses and parts thereof of all cattle, sheep, swine, and goats to be prepared for human consumption at any slaughtering, meat-canning, salting, packing, rendering, or similar establishment in any State, Territory, or the District of Columbia for transportation or sale as articles of interstate or foreign commerce; and the carcasses and parts thereof of all such animals found to be sound, healthful, wholesome, and fit for human food shall be marked, stamped, tagged, or labeled as “Inspected and passed;” and said inspectors shall label, mark, stamp, or tag as “Inspected and condemned,” all carcasses and parts thereof of animals found to be unsound, unhealthful, unwholesome, or otherwise unfit for human food; and all carcasses and parts thereof thus inspected and condemned shall be destroyed for food purposes by the said establishment in the presence of an inspector, and the Secretary of Agriculture may remove inspectors from any such establishment which fails to* so destroy any such condemned carcass or part thereof. . . .
That for the purposes hereinbefore set forth the Secretary of Agriculture shall cause to be made by inspectors appointed for that purpose an examination and inspection of all meat food products prepared for interstate or foreign commerce in any slaughtering, meat-canning, salting, packing, rendering, or similar establishment, and for the purposes of any examination and inspection said inspectors shall have access at all times, by day or night, whether the establishment be operated or not, to every part of said establishment; and said inspectors shall mark, stamp, tag, or label as “Inspected and passed” all such products found to be sound, healthful, and wholesome, and which contain no dyes, chemicals, preservatives, or ingredients which render such meat or meat food products unsound, unhealthful, unwholesome, or unfit for *284 human food; and said inspectors shall label, mark, stamp, or tag as “Inspected and condemned” all such products found unsound, unhealthful, and unwholesome, or which contain dyes, chemicals, preservatives, or ingredients which render such meat or meat food products unsound, unhealthful, unwholesome, pr unfit for human food, and all such condemned, meat food products shall be destroyed for food purposes; as hereinbefore provided, and the Secretary of Agriculture may remove inspectors from any establishment whieh fails to so destroy such condemned meat food products.
********
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
235 U.S. 282, 35 S. Ct. 44, 59 L. Ed. 229, 1914 U.S. LEXIS 1022, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/united-states-v-lewis-scotus-1914.