United States v. Lewis Greg Barentine

908 F.2d 968, 1990 U.S. App. LEXIS 11899, 1990 WL 101450
CourtCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit
DecidedJuly 16, 1990
Docket90-6758
StatusUnpublished

This text of 908 F.2d 968 (United States v. Lewis Greg Barentine) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
United States v. Lewis Greg Barentine, 908 F.2d 968, 1990 U.S. App. LEXIS 11899, 1990 WL 101450 (4th Cir. 1990).

Opinion

908 F.2d 968
Unpublished Disposition

NOTICE: Fourth Circuit I.O.P. 36.6 states that citation of unpublished dispositions is disfavored except for establishing res judicata, estoppel, or the law of the case and requires service of copies of cited unpublished dispositions of the Fourth Circuit.
UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee,
v.
Lewis Greg BARENTINE, Defendant-Appellant.

No. 90-6758.

United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit.

Submitted May 4, 1990.
Decided July 16, 1990.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Western District of North Carolina, at Charlotte. Robert D. Potter, Chief District Judge. (CR-85-62-C; CA-89-105-C-P)

Lewis Greg Barentine, appellant pro se.

Max Oliver Cogburn, Jr., Office of the United States Attorney, Asheville, N.C., for appellee.

W.D.N.C., 728 F.Supp. 1241

AFFIRMED.

Before K.K. HALL and WILKINSON, Circuit Judges, and BUTZNER, Senior Circuit Judge.

PER CURIAM:

Lewis Greg Barentine appeals from the district court's order refusing relief under 28 U.S.C. Sec. 2255. Our review of the record and the district court's opinion accepting the recommendation of the magistrate discloses that this appeal is without merit. Accordingly, we affirm on the reasoning of the district court. United States v. Barentine, CR-85-62-C; CA-89-105-C-P (W.D.N.C. Jan. 9, 1990). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the Court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Barentine v. United States
728 F. Supp. 1241 (W.D. North Carolina, 1990)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
908 F.2d 968, 1990 U.S. App. LEXIS 11899, 1990 WL 101450, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/united-states-v-lewis-greg-barentine-ca4-1990.