United States v. Lewis
This text of 177 F. App'x 554 (United States v. Lewis) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
MEMORANDUM
Randy Joe Lewis appeals from the imposition of two special conditions of his supervised release after pleading guilty to two counts of being a felon in possession of a firearm, in violation of 18 U.S.C. § 922(g)(1). We have jurisdiction pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1291, and we affirm.
Lewis contends that the condition that he abstain from alcohol is improper because it is not reasonably related to his offense, history, or personal characteristics. This condition is not improper. See United States v. Carter, 159 F.3d 397, 401 (9th Cir.1998).
Lewis also contends that the condition that requires him to pay the cost of his drug and alcohol treatment as directed by his probation officer constitutes an improper delegation of the district court’s authority. This condition is not an improper delegation of the district court’s authority. See United States v. Dupas, 419 F.3d 916, 922-24 (9th Cir.2005).
AFFIRMED.
This disposition is not appropriate for publication and may not be cited to or by the courts of this circuit except as provided by 9th Cir. R. 36-3.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
177 F. App'x 554, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/united-states-v-lewis-ca9-2006.