United States v. Lewis
55 F. App'x 640
Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit·Decided February 5, 2003·No. No. 02-7795·Published·Cited by 1 cases
Opinion
Andre Gerard Lewis appeals the magistrate judge’s order denying his motion to inspect grand jury transcripts. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the magistrate judge. See United States v. Lewis, No. CR-99-314-3 (E.D.Va. Nov. 14, 2002). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
United States v. Lewis, 55 F. App'x 640 (4th Cir. 2003).
55 F. App'x 640 (United States v. Lewis) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
Hidalgo v. United States
540 U.S. 858 (Supreme Court, 2003)