United States v. Lewis

697 F. App'x 618
CourtCourt of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit
DecidedAugust 29, 2017
DocketNo. 16-11940 Non-Argument Calendar
StatusPublished

This text of 697 F. App'x 618 (United States v. Lewis) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
United States v. Lewis, 697 F. App'x 618 (11th Cir. 2017).

Opinion

PER CURIAM:

Thomas M. Goggans, retained counsel for Christopher Antonio Lewis in this appeal from the denial of Lewis’s 18 U.S.C. § 3682(c)(2) motion for a reduction in sentence, has moved to withdraw from further representation of the appellant and filed a brief pursuant to Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738, 87 S.Ct. 1396, 18 L.Ed.2d 493 (1967). Our independent review of the entire record reveals that counsel’s assessment of the relative merit of the appeal is [619]*619correct. Because the record reveals no arguable issues of merit, counsel’s motion to withdraw is GRANTED and the order denying Lewis’s motion is AFFIRMED.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Anders v. California
386 U.S. 738 (Supreme Court, 1967)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
697 F. App'x 618, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/united-states-v-lewis-ca11-2017.