United States v. Levy Joseph Williams

Fifth Circuit

United States v. Levy Joseph Williams

487 F.2d 215, 1973 U.S. App. LEXIS 6925

CourtCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit

DecidedNovember 20, 1973

Docket73-2662

StatusPublished

Cited by5 cases

This text of 487 F.2d 215 (United States v. Levy Joseph Williams) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

United States v. Levy Joseph Williams, 487 F.2d 215, 1973 U.S. App. LEXIS 6925 (5th Cir. 1973).

Pincite

Opinion

PER CURIAM:

Appellant Williams plead guilty to a violation of 18 U.S.C. §§ 2113(a). 1 At the time the federal sentence was imposed the appellant was in custody of state authorities under a criminal charge. The federal sentence was to commence when he was released to the custody of a United States Marshal. He now challenges the sentence imposed claiming that his federal sentence should run concurrently with his detention by the state. We find no merit in this contention. His federal sentence was imposed in accordance with the applicable law and the constitutionally protected rights of the appellant.' See Blackshear v. United States, 434 F.2d 58 (5th Cir. 1970) and 18 U.S.C. § 3568.

Affirmed.

1

. The violation arose from the robbery of a savings and loan association.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

PER CURIAM:

Appellant Williams plead guilty to a violation of 18 U.S.C. §§ 2113(a). 1 At the time the federal sentence was imposed the appellant was in custody of state authorities under a criminal charge. The federal sentence was to commence when he was released to the custody of a United States Marshal. He now challenges the sentence imposed claiming that his federal sentence should run concurrently with his detention by the state. We find no merit in this contention. His federal sentence was imposed in accordance with the applicable law and the constitutionally protected rights of the appellant.' See Blackshear v. United States, 434 F.2d 58 (5th Cir. 1970) and 18 U.S.C. § 3568.

Affirmed.

1

. The violation arose from the robbery of a savings and loan association.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

487 F.2d 215, 1973 U.S. App. LEXIS 6925, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/united-states-v-levy-joseph-williams-ca5-1973.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack