United States v. Levitt

26 F. Cas. 919, 1 N.Y. Leg. Obs. 92
CourtDistrict Court, D. Massachusetts
DecidedJuly 1, 1842
StatusPublished
Cited by3 cases

This text of 26 F. Cas. 919 (United States v. Levitt) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court, D. Massachusetts primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
United States v. Levitt, 26 F. Cas. 919, 1 N.Y. Leg. Obs. 92 (D. Mass. 1842).

Opinion

DAYIS, District Judge,

addressed the jury in a most able and impartial charge, in the course of which he alluded to a former decision in relation to sugar. The duty on loaf sugar, he said had been fixed at a very high rate, but was eluded in many cases by the introduction of an article in a pounded state. The government claimed the duty, but the court notwithstanding the pounded sugar was superior to the best American loaf sugar that could be obtained, decided that it was not loaf sugar, and therefore not subject to duty.

The jury, after some deliberation, gave it as their opinion that the articles in question were leaden busts and consequently free from duty.

The total amount of lead imported by Messrs. Levitt & Co., in the shape of busts during the summer, was stated to be 664,000 pounds.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

E. M. Stevens Corp. v. United States
56 Cust. Ct. 494 (U.S. Customs Court, 1966)
Heyliger v. United States
11 Ct. Cust. 90 (Customs and Patent Appeals, 1921)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
26 F. Cas. 919, 1 N.Y. Leg. Obs. 92, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/united-states-v-levitt-mad-1842.