United States v. Leslie

122 F. App'x 686
Procedural entryThis page is a short order in United States v. Leslie. Read the opinion of the Court — 46 F. App'x 699
Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit·Decided March 9, 2005·No. 04-8030·Unpublished

Opinion

PER CURIAM:

Neville Sylvester Leslie appeals the district court’s order denying relief on his motion filed pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 3742(a)(1) (2000). We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. See United States v. Leslie, No. CR-98-152 (E.D. Va. filed Dec. 17, 2004 & entered Dec. 20, 2004). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

United States v. Leslie, 122 F. App'x 686 (4th Cir. 2005).

122 F. App'x 686 (United States v. Leslie) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Review of a sentence
18 U.S.C. § 3742(a)(1)