United States v. Leslie

Opinion

UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 00-6478

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

Plaintiff - Appellee,

versus

NEVILLE SYLVESTER LESLIE,

Defendant - Appellant.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Virginia, at Alexandria. Leonie M. Brinkema, District Judge. (CR-98-152, CA-99-1029-AM)

Submitted: November 30, 2000 Decided: December 13, 2000

Before MICHAEL and MOTZ, Circuit Judges, and HAMILTON, Senior Cir- cuit Judge.

Dismissed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Pleasant Sanford Brodnax, III, Washington, D.C., for Appellant. Thomas More Hollenhorst, Assistant United States Attorney, Alex- andria, Virginia, for Appellee.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. See Local Rule 36(c). PER CURIAM:

Neville Sylvester Leslie seeks to appeal the district court’s

order denying his motion filed under 28 U.S.C.A. § 2255 (West Supp.

2000). We have reviewed the record and the district court’s opin-

ion and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we deny a certif-

icate of appealability and dismiss the appeal on the reasoning of

the district court. See United States v. Leslie, Nos. CR-98-152;

CA-99-1029-AM (E.D. Va. Aug. 13, 1999). We dispense with oral

argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately

presented in the materials before the court and argument would not

aid the decisional process.

DISMISSED