United States v. Leroy McCoy
This text of 485 F. App'x 884 (United States v. Leroy McCoy) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
MEMORANDUM **
Leroy McCoy appeals from the 24-month sentence imposed upon revocation of supervised release. We have jurisdiction under 28 U.S.C. § 1291, and we affirm.
McCoy contends that the district court erred by failing to provide specific reasons for his above-Guidelines sentence, making it impossible to determine if the court relied on impermissible factors. The record belies this contention. The district court noted McCoy’s history and background and concluded that he was not amenable to supervision based on his past violations. Nothing more was required. See United States v. Leonard, 483 F.3d 635, 637 (9th Cir.2007).
AFFIRMED.
This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by 9 th Cir. R. 36-3.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
485 F. App'x 884, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/united-states-v-leroy-mccoy-ca9-2012.