United States v. Leroy McCoy

485 F. App'x 884
Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit·Decided October 16, 2012·No. 12-10066·Unpublished

Opinion

MEMORANDUM **

Leroy McCoy appeals from the 24-month sentence imposed upon revocation of supervised release. We have jurisdiction under 28 U.S.C. § 1291, and we affirm.

McCoy contends that the district court erred by failing to provide specific reasons for his above-Guidelines sentence, making it impossible to determine if the court relied on impermissible factors. The record belies this contention. The district court noted McCoy’s history and background and concluded that he was not amenable to supervision based on his past violations. Nothing more was required. See United States v. Leonard, 483 F.3d 635, 637 (9th Cir.2007).

AFFIRMED.

**

This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by 9 th Cir. R. 36-3.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

United States v. Leroy McCoy, 485 F. App'x 884 (9th Cir. 2012).

485 F. App'x 884 (United States v. Leroy McCoy) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

United States v. Earl Dejon Leonard
483 F.3d 635 (Ninth Circuit, 2007)