United States v. Leonicio Castaneda-Alfaro

400 F. App'x 813
Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit·Decided October 26, 2010·No. 09-41118·Unpublished·Cited by 1 cases

Opinion

PER CURIAM: *

Leonicio Castaneda-Alfaro appeals the sentence imposed following his conviction for unlawful reentry pursuant to 8 U.S.C. § 1326. He contends that the district court erred by imposing a crime of violence enhancement based on his conviction under Texas Penal Code § 21.11 for indecency with a child under 17 years of age.

As Castaneda-Alfaro concedes, his argument is foreclosed by circuit precedent. See United States v. Ayala, 542 F.3d 494, 495 (5th Cir.2008); United States v. Zavala-Sustaita, 214 F.3d 601, 607-08 (5th Cir. *814 2000). Accordingly, the judgment of the district court is AFFIRMED.

*

Pursuant to 5th Cir. R. 47.5, the court has determined that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5th Cir. R. 47.5.4.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

United States v. Leonicio Castaneda-Alfaro, 400 F. App'x 813 (5th Cir. 2010).

400 F. App'x 813 (United States v. Leonicio Castaneda-Alfaro) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Castaneda-Alfaro v. United States
180 L. Ed. 2d 228 (Supreme Court, 2011)