United States v. Leonard Wesley Phye

437 F.2d 364
CourtCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
DecidedJanuary 29, 1971
Docket25652_1
StatusPublished

This text of 437 F.2d 364 (United States v. Leonard Wesley Phye) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
United States v. Leonard Wesley Phye, 437 F.2d 364 (9th Cir. 1971).

Opinion

PER CURIAM:

Appellant Phye appeals from his conviction for smuggling 534 parrots into the United States from Mexico in violation of 18 U.S.C. § 545.

While Phye was in Mexico, he arranged with Porfirio Ruelas for Ruelas to pick up the parrots in Mexico, conceal them at the border, and deliver them to Phye in this country. Phye helped load the parrots in Ruelas’ car, paid Ruelas $170 for the job, and retrieved the parrots in the United States. Until after his arrest, Phye did not know that Ruelas was a Government informer cooperating with customs officials.

Phye complains on appeal that the Government’s participation in the smuggling relieved him of criminal responsibility, because the Government, not he, transported the parrots across the border without making the requisite declaration. We have often held to the contrary. (E. g., Pederson v. United States (9th Cir. 1968) 392 F.2d 41; Juvera v. United States (9th Cir. 1967) 378 F.2d 433.)

His remaining arguments are not supported by the record below and require no comment.

Judgment affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
437 F.2d 364, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/united-states-v-leonard-wesley-phye-ca9-1971.