United States v. Leonard Faymore

787 F.2d 593, 1986 U.S. App. LEXIS 19516, 1986 WL 16680
CourtCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit
DecidedMarch 14, 1986
Docket85-3501
StatusUnpublished

This text of 787 F.2d 593 (United States v. Leonard Faymore) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
United States v. Leonard Faymore, 787 F.2d 593, 1986 U.S. App. LEXIS 19516, 1986 WL 16680 (6th Cir. 1986).

Opinion

787 F.2d 593

Unpublished Disposition
NOTICE: Sixth Circuit Rule 24(c) states that citation of unpublished dispositions is disfavored except for establishing res judicata, estoppel, or the law of the case and requires service of copies of cited unpublished dispositions of the Sixth Circuit.
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff-Appellee,
v.
LEONARD FAYMORE, Defendant-Appellant.

85-3501

United States Court of Appeals, Sixth Circuit.

3/14/86

APPEAL DISMISSED

N.D.Ohio

ORDER

BEFORE: ENGEL, MILBURN and RYAN, Circuit Judges.

This matter is before the Court upon consideration of appellant's response to this Court's December 11, 1985, order to show cause why his appeal should not be dismissed for lack of jurisdiction because of a late filed notice of appeal.

It appears from the record that the order denying the motion for reduction of sentence pursuant to Rule 35, Federal Rules of Criminal Procedure, was entered on June 11, 1985. A Rule 35 motion is filed in the original criminal action, and is therefore part of a criminal proceeding. A notice of appeal is therefore due to be filed within ten days from entry of the order denying the Rule 35 motion. Rule 4(b), Federal Rules of Appellate Procedure; United States v. Russo, 760 F.2d 1229 (11th Cir. 1985); United States v. Guiterrez, 556 F.2d 1217 (5th Cir. 1977); Johnson v. United States, 334 F.2d 880, 883 (6th Cir. 1964), cert. denied, 380 U.S. 935 (1965); Hixon v. United States, 268 F.2d 666 (10th Cir. 1959); United States v. Quon, 241 F.2d 161 (2nd Cir.), cert. denied, 354 U.S. 913 (1957). See also Heflin v. United States, 358 U.S. 415, 418 n.7 (1959). Rule 4(b) requires a notice of appeal to be filed, not mailed, within ten days. Mailing of a notice of appeal does not constitute filing, and an appellant is not entitled to three additional days. See Pryor v. Marshall, 711 F.2d 63 (6th Cir. 1983). The notice of appeal filed on June 24, 1985, was three days late.

It is ORDERED that the appeal be and hereby is dismissed. Rule 9(d)(1), Rules of the Sixth Circuit. However, this dismissal is without prejudice to any right appellant may have to file a motion for an extension of time in the district court pursuant to Rule 4(b), Federal Rules of Appellate Procedure, to file late his notice of appeal.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Heflin v. United States
358 U.S. 415 (Supreme Court, 1959)
United States v. James Quon
241 F.2d 161 (Second Circuit, 1957)
Clyde Johnson v. United States
334 F.2d 880 (Sixth Circuit, 1964)
Ralph Pryor v. R.C. Marshall, Sup't.
711 F.2d 63 (Sixth Circuit, 1983)
United States v. James Russo, Jr.
760 F.2d 1229 (Eleventh Circuit, 1985)
Sullivan v. Michigan Dept. Of Corrections
787 F.2d 593 (Sixth Circuit, 1986)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
787 F.2d 593, 1986 U.S. App. LEXIS 19516, 1986 WL 16680, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/united-states-v-leonard-faymore-ca6-1986.