United States v. Leon James Ridings

25 F.3d 1042, 1994 U.S. App. LEXIS 20872, 1994 WL 196782
CourtCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit
DecidedMay 19, 1994
Docket93-6796
StatusPublished

This text of 25 F.3d 1042 (United States v. Leon James Ridings) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
United States v. Leon James Ridings, 25 F.3d 1042, 1994 U.S. App. LEXIS 20872, 1994 WL 196782 (4th Cir. 1994).

Opinion

25 F.3d 1042
NOTICE: Fourth Circuit I.O.P. 36.6 states that citation of unpublished dispositions is disfavored except for establishing res judicata, estoppel, or the law of the case and requires service of copies of cited unpublished dispositions of the Fourth Circuit.

UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff Appellee,
v.
Leon James RIDINGS, Defendant Appellant.

No. 93-6796.

United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit.

Submitted March 22, 1994.
Decided May 19, 1994.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Western District of North Carolina, at Statesville. Richard L. Voorhees, Chief District Judge. (CR-89-20-ST, CA-92-22-5-V)

Leon James Ridings, appellant pro se.

Jerry Wayne Miller, Office of the United States Attorney, Asheville, NC, for appellee.

W.D.N.C.

AFFIRMED.

Before PHILLIPS, WILKINSON, and NIEMEYER, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM:

Appellant appeals from the district court's order denying his 28 U.S.C. Sec. 2255 (1988) motion. Our review of the record and the district court's opinion discloses that this appeal is without merit. Accordingly, we grant Appellant's motion to proceed in forma pauperis and affirm on the reasoning of the district court.* United States v. Ridings, Nos. CR-89-20-ST; CA-92-22-5-V (W.D.N.C. July 19, 1993). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the Court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED

*

We deny Appellant's Motion for Discovery

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
25 F.3d 1042, 1994 U.S. App. LEXIS 20872, 1994 WL 196782, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/united-states-v-leon-james-ridings-ca4-1994.