United States v. Leon Henry

Procedural entryThis page is a short order in United States v. Leon Henry. Read the opinion of the Court — 430 F. App'x 151
Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit·Decided June 9, 2011·No. 09-2896·Unpublished

Opinion

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE THIRD CIRCUIT ____________

No. 09-2896 ____________

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA

v.

LEON HENRY, JR. Appellant ____________

APPEAL FROM THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF PENNSYLVANIA (D.C. Crim. Action No. 2:00-cr-00667-PBT-4) District Judge: Honorable Petrese B. Tucker _______________

Submitted Under Third Circuit LAR 34.1(a) April 28, 2011 _______________

ORDER _______________

The opinion filed on May 9, 2011 shall be amended as follows: at page 4, where (2) “allow the parties to argue their positions relative to what they believe is an appropriate sentence;” shall be replaced with (2) “they must formally rule on the motions of both parties and state on the record whether they are granting a departure and how that departure affects the Guidelines calculation, and take into account the court’s pre-Booker case law, which continues to have advisory force.” This does not affect the Judgment issued by the Court on May 9, 2011. An amended opinion will be filed; however the original filing date will not be altered.

BY THE COURT:

/s/ Joseph A. Greenaway, Jr. Circuit Judge Dated: June 9, 2011

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

United States v. Leon Henry, (3d Cir. 2011).

United States v. Leon Henry (United States v. Leon Henry) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.