United States v. Leo Franklin Forester

346 F.2d 685, 1965 U.S. App. LEXIS 5501
CourtCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit
DecidedMay 20, 1965
Docket9753
StatusPublished
Cited by3 cases

This text of 346 F.2d 685 (United States v. Leo Franklin Forester) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
United States v. Leo Franklin Forester, 346 F.2d 685, 1965 U.S. App. LEXIS 5501 (4th Cir. 1965).

Opinion

PER CURIAM:

A trial to the District Court, without a jury, upon an eight-count information resulted in each instance in the conviction of Leo Franklin Forester for violation of the Federal Food, Drug, and Cosmetic Act, §§ 503(b) (1) (B) and S01(k), 21 U.S.C. §§ 353(b) (1) (B) and 331(k). Offering no evidence for himself or objection to the prosecution’s proof, defendant stood in the trial court upon a motion ' to dismiss the information for the unconstitutionality of § 503(b) (1) (B) because of vagueness and uncertainty. The Court denied the motion, adjudged Forester guilty and sentenced him to one year imprisonment, with suspension of the last six months during probation of five years. We find no error in the trial or judgment. United States v. 2600 State Drugs, Inc., 235 F.2d 913 (7 Cir. 1956), cert. den. 352 U.S. 848, 77 S.Ct. 68, 1 L.Ed.2d 59 (1956).

Affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

United States v. Scully
108 F. Supp. 3d 59 (E.D. New York, 2015)
United States v. Travia
180 F. Supp. 2d 115 (District of Columbia, 2001)
United States v. General Nutrition, Inc.
638 F. Supp. 556 (W.D. New York, 1986)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
346 F.2d 685, 1965 U.S. App. LEXIS 5501, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/united-states-v-leo-franklin-forester-ca4-1965.