United States v. Leo Franklin Forester

346 F.2d 685, 1965 U.S. App. LEXIS 5501
Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit·Decided May 20, 1965·No. 9753·Published·Cited by 3 cases

Opinion

PER CURIAM:

A trial to the District Court, without a jury, upon an eight-count information resulted in each instance in the conviction of Leo Franklin Forester for violation of the Federal Food, Drug, and Cosmetic Act, §§ 503(b) (1) (B) and S01(k), 21 U.S.C. §§ 353(b) (1) (B) and 331(k). Offering no evidence for himself or objection to the prosecution’s proof, defendant stood in the trial court upon a motion ' to dismiss the information for the unconstitutionality of § 503(b) (1) (B) because of vagueness and uncertainty. The Court denied the motion, adjudged Forester guilty and sentenced him to one year imprisonment, with suspension of the last six months during probation of five years. We find no error in the trial or judgment. United States v. 2600 State Drugs, Inc., 235 F.2d 913 (7 Cir. 1956), cert. den. 352 U.S. 848, 77 S.Ct. 68, 1 L.Ed.2d 59 (1956).

Affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

United States v. Leo Franklin Forester, 346 F.2d 685, 1965 U.S. App. LEXIS 5501 (4th Cir. 1965).

346 F.2d 685 (United States v. Leo Franklin Forester) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

United States v. Scully
108 F. Supp. 3d 59 (E.D. New York, 2015)
United States v. Travia
180 F. Supp. 2d 115 (District of Columbia, 2001)
United States v. General Nutrition, Inc.
638 F. Supp. 556 (W.D. New York, 1986)