United States v. Lendro Baker
This text of 336 F.2d 1022 (United States v. Lendro Baker) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
336 F.2d 1022
UNITED STATES of America, Appellee,
v.
Lendro BAKER, Appellant.
No. 9455.
United States Court of Appeals Fourth Circuit.
Argued Sept. 23, 1964.
Decided Sept. 28, 1964.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of Maryland, at Baltimore; Edward S. Northrop, District Judge.
Robert Eugene Smith, Baltimore, Md. (court-assigned counsel) (Melvin Rankin, Baltimore, Md., on brief), for appellant.
Robert J. Carson, Asst. U.S. Atty. (Thomas J. Kenney, U.S. Atty., on brief), for appellee.
Before HAYNSWORTH and BRYAN, Circuit Judges, and BUTZNER, District judge.
PER CURIAM.
After considering the argument of counsel, the briefs and the record in this case, we find no error affecting any substantial right of the appellant.
Affirmed.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
336 F.2d 1022, 1964 U.S. App. LEXIS 4270, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/united-states-v-lendro-baker-ca4-1964.