United States v. Leipold

Eleventh Circuit

United States v. Leipold

671 F. App'x 763

Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit·Decided December 15, 2016·No. No. 15-15683 Non-Argument Calendar·Published

Opinion

PER CURIAM:

Jonathan Dodson, appointed counsel for Stacie E. Leipold in this direct criminal appeal, has filed a motion to withdraw from further representation of the appellant and filed a brief prepared pursuant to Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738, 87 S.Ct. 1396, 18 L.Ed.2d 493 (1967). Our independent review of the entire record reveals that counsel’s assessment of the relative merit of the appeal is correct. Because independent examination of the entire record reveals no arguable issues of merit, counsel’s motion to withdraw is GRANTED, and Leipold’s conviction and sentence are AFFIRMED.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

PER CURIAM:

Jonathan Dodson, appointed counsel for Stacie E. Leipold in this direct criminal appeal, has filed a motion to withdraw from further representation of the appellant and filed a brief prepared pursuant to Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738, 87 S.Ct. 1396, 18 L.Ed.2d 493 (1967). Our independent review of the entire record reveals that counsel’s assessment of the relative merit of the appeal is correct. Because independent examination of the entire record reveals no arguable issues of merit, counsel’s motion to withdraw is GRANTED, and Leipold’s conviction and sentence are AFFIRMED.

United States v. Leipold, 671 F. App'x 763 (11th Cir. 2016).

Pincite

671 F. App'x 763 (United States v. Leipold) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Opinion

Related