United States v. Leftwich

373 F. App'x 333
Procedural entryThis page is a short order in United States v. Leftwich. Read the opinion of the Court — 628 F.3d 665
Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit·Decided April 6, 2010·No. No. 10-6047·Published

Opinion

PER CURIAM:

Corey Michael Leftwich seeks to appeal the district court’s order construing his motion for an evidentiary hearing as a successive 28 U.S.C.A. § 2255 (West Supp. 2009) motion and dismissing it on that basis. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. United States v. Leftwich, No. 4:00-cr-00037-H-1 (E.D.N.C. filed Dec. 16, 2009; entered Dec. 17, 2009). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

United States v. Leftwich, 373 F. App'x 333 (4th Cir. 2010).

373 F. App'x 333 (United States v. Leftwich) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related