United States v. Lee Marshall Harris and Morris Ray Caldwell
This text of 427 F.2d 1368 (United States v. Lee Marshall Harris and Morris Ray Caldwell) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
427 F.2d 1368
UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellant,
v.
Lee Marshall HARRIS and Morris Ray Caldwell, Defendants-Appellees.
No. 25120.
United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit.
July 27, 1970, Rehearing Denied Aug. 28, 1970.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the Central District of California; Manuel L. Real, Judge.
Richard L. Jaeger (argued), Asst. U.S. Atty., William Matthew Byrne, Jr., U.S. Atty., J. Kent Steele, Asst. U.S. Atty., Robert L Brosio, Chief, Criminal Division, Los Angeles, Cal., for appellant.
Burton Marks, of Marks, Sherman & London, Beverly Hills, Cal., for appellee Caldwell.
Frederic A. Spindell, Hollywood, Cal., for appellee Harris.
Before KOELSCH and HUFSTEDLER, Circuit Judges, and THOMPSON1 District Judge.
PER CURIAM:
The narcotics were seized in circumstances essentially similar to those in Castillo-Garcia v. United States, 424 F.2d 482 (9th Cir. 1970); accordingly, the order of the district court suppressing the use of such drugs as evidence is
Reversed.
Honorable Bruce R. Thompson, United States District Judge, Reno, Nevada, sitting by designation
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
427 F.2d 1368, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/united-states-v-lee-marshall-harris-and-morris-ray-caldwell-ca9-1970.