United States v. Lee

26 F. Cas. 907, 2 D.C. 104, 2 Cranch 104
CourtU.S. Circuit Court for the District of District of Columbia
DecidedNovember 15, 1814
StatusPublished
Cited by5 cases

This text of 26 F. Cas. 907 (United States v. Lee) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering U.S. Circuit Court for the District of District of Columbia primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
United States v. Lee, 26 F. Cas. 907, 2 D.C. 104, 2 Cranch 104 (circtddc 1814).

Opinion

The Court

(Thruston, J., absent,)

were of opinion that the declaration of the prisoner accompanying the overt act laid in the indictment may be given in evidence to show the intent with which the act was done; but that his confession of having given information of the channel, and of his having been on board the fleet, was not evidence.

The jury, after retiring a few minutes, found the prisoner not guilty.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Allen v. Selig
200 F.2d 487 (Fifth Circuit, 1952)
Tomoya Kawakita v. United States
190 F.2d 506 (Ninth Circuit, 1951)
Cramer v. United States
325 U.S. 1 (Supreme Court, 1945)
Schulze v. United States
259 F. 189 (Ninth Circuit, 1919)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
26 F. Cas. 907, 2 D.C. 104, 2 Cranch 104, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/united-states-v-lee-circtddc-1814.