United States v. Lee

Fourth Circuit

United States v. Lee

550 F. App'x 169

Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit·Decided January 17, 2014·No. No. 13-7397·Published

Opinion

PER CURIAM:

Paul A. Lee appeals the district court’s order denying his petition for writ of error coram nobis. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. United States v. Lee, No. 5:89-cr-00273-FPS-1, 2013 WL 4591220 (N.D.W.Va. Aug. 28, 2013). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

PER CURIAM:

Paul A. Lee appeals the district court’s order denying his petition for writ of error coram nobis. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. United States v. Lee, No. 5:89-cr-00273-FPS-1, 2013 WL 4591220 (N.D.W.Va. Aug. 28, 2013). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED.

United States v. Lee, 550 F. App'x 169 (4th Cir. 2014).

Pincite

550 F. App'x 169 (United States v. Lee) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.