United States v. Lechuga-Montalvo
This text of 324 F. App'x 666 (United States v. Lechuga-Montalvo) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
MEMORANDUM
Juan Armando Lechuga-Montalvo appeals the district court’s order revoking his supervised release, and the sentence imposed upon revocation.
Lechuga-Montalvo contends that the supervised release revocation procedure set forth in 18 U.S.C. § 3583 is unconstitutional. This contention is foreclosed by our recent decision in United States v. Santana, 526 F.3d 1257, 1262 (9th Cir.2008). We reject Lechuga-Montalvo’s contention that his case is distinguishable from Santana.
AFFIRMED.
This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by 9th Cir. R. 36-3.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
324 F. App'x 666, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/united-states-v-lechuga-montalvo-ca9-2009.