United States v. Lechenger

173 F. 1023, 97 C.C.A. 670, 1909 U.S. App. LEXIS 5141
CourtCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit
DecidedNovember 9, 1909
DocketNo. 1,868
StatusPublished

This text of 173 F. 1023 (United States v. Lechenger) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
United States v. Lechenger, 173 F. 1023, 97 C.C.A. 670, 1909 U.S. App. LEXIS 5141 (5th Cir. 1909).

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

This case, brought by information in rem for the condemnation of certain alleged smuggled goods, was tried on the claimants’ plea of former jeopardy by the court under a stipulation jn writing waiving a jury, and the finding was general in favor of the claimants. The assignments of error suggest conclusions of law based upon the evidence. There was no finding of facts nor bill of exceptions showing the evidence or any rulings of the court in the progress of the trial, and the only questions reviewahle are as to the sufficiency of the'pleadings to warrant the judgment of the court. The pleadings are sufficient, and the judgment of the District Court is therefore affirmed, on authority of Coffey v. United States, 116 U. S. 436, 6 Sup. Ct. 437, 29 L. Ed. 684; United States v. McKee, Fed. Cas. No. 15,688.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Coffey v. United States
116 U.S. 436 (Supreme Court, 1886)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
173 F. 1023, 97 C.C.A. 670, 1909 U.S. App. LEXIS 5141, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/united-states-v-lechenger-ca5-1909.