United States v. Leaman

16 C.M.A. 191, 16 USCMA 191, 36 C.M.R. 347, 1966 CMA LEXIS 272, 1966 WL 4478
Procedural entryThis page is a short order in United States v. Leaman. Read the opinion of the Court — 16 C.M.A. 189
United States Court of Military Appeals·Decided April 8, 1966·No. No. 19,143·Published

Opinion

Opinion of the Court

FeRguson, Judge:

In this separate trial by general court-martial, the accused contends that Colonel Andrew I. Lyman, ordinarily the Chief of Staff, Third Marine Division, was not in fact acting as Commanding Officer, Third Marine Division, and hence did not have the authority to review th'e record in the court-martial which tried him. See also United States v Leaman, 16 USCMA 189, 36 CMR 345, this day decided.

For the reasons stated in United States v Kugima, 16 USCMA 183, 36 CMR 339, this day decided, we find Colonel Lyman to have been the Commanding Officer, Third Marine Division, at the time he acted upon the record of trial in the accused’s case.

The decision of the board of review is affirmed.

Chief Judge Quinn and Judge Kil-day concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

United States v. Leaman, 16 C.M.A. 191, 16 USCMA 191, 36 C.M.R. 347, 1966 CMA LEXIS 272, 1966 WL 4478 (cma 1966).

16 C.M.A. 191 (United States v. Leaman) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

United States v. Kugima
16 C.M.A. 183 (United States Court of Military Appeals, 1966)
United States v. Leaman
16 C.M.A. 189 (United States Court of Military Appeals, 1966)