United States v. Leal

Opinion

Case: 22-40645 Document: 00516683028 Page: 1 Date Filed: 03/21/2023

United States Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit United States Court of Appeals Fifth Circuit

____________

FILED

March 21, 2023

No. 22-40645 Summary Calendar Lyle W. Cayce ____________ Clerk

United States of America,

Plaintiff—Appellee,

versus

Carlos Leal,

Defendant—Appellant.

______________________________

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Southern District of Texas USDC No. 1:21-CR-12-4

______________________________

Before Stewart, Dennis, and Willett, Circuit Judges. Per Curiam: * The attorney appointed to represent Carlos Leal has moved for leave to withdraw and has filed a brief in accordance with Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738 (1967), and United States v. Flores, 632 F.3d 229 (5th Cir. 2011). Leal has not filed a response. We have reviewed counsel’s brief and the relevant portions of the record reflected therein. We concur with counsel’s

_____________________

*

This opinion is not designated for publication. See 5th Cir. R. 47.5.

Case: 22-40645 Document: 00516683028 Page: 2 Date Filed: 03/21/2023

No. 22-40645

assessment that the appeal presents no nonfrivolous issue for appellate review. Accordingly, counsel’s motion for leave to withdraw is GRANTED, counsel is excused from further responsibilities herein, and the appeal is DISMISSED. See 5th Cir. R. 42.2.