United States v. Leal
This text of United States v. Leal (United States v. Leal) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
Case: 22-40645 Document: 00516683028 Page: 1 Date Filed: 03/21/2023
United States Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit United States Court of Appeals Fifth Circuit ____________ FILED March 21, 2023 No. 22-40645 Summary Calendar Lyle W. Cayce ____________ Clerk
United States of America,
Plaintiff—Appellee,
versus
Carlos Leal,
Defendant—Appellant. ______________________________
Appeal from the United States District Court for the Southern District of Texas USDC No. 1:21-CR-12-4 ______________________________
Before Stewart, Dennis, and Willett, Circuit Judges. Per Curiam: * The attorney appointed to represent Carlos Leal has moved for leave to withdraw and has filed a brief in accordance with Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738 (1967), and United States v. Flores, 632 F.3d 229 (5th Cir. 2011). Leal has not filed a response. We have reviewed counsel’s brief and the relevant portions of the record reflected therein. We concur with counsel’s
_____________________ * This opinion is not designated for publication. See 5th Cir. R. 47.5. Case: 22-40645 Document: 00516683028 Page: 2 Date Filed: 03/21/2023
No. 22-40645
assessment that the appeal presents no nonfrivolous issue for appellate review. Accordingly, counsel’s motion for leave to withdraw is GRANTED, counsel is excused from further responsibilities herein, and the appeal is DISMISSED. See 5th Cir. R. 42.2.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
United States v. Leal, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/united-states-v-leal-ca5-2023.