United States v. Leal

Eleventh Circuit

United States v. Leal

177 F. App'x 868

Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit·Decided April 13, 2006·No. No. 05-15771; D.C. Docket No. 05-00021-CR-4-RH-WCS·Published

Opinion

PER CURIAM:

Chet Kaufman, appointed counsel for Jeremy Leal, has moved to withdraw from further representation of Leal, because, in his opinion, the appeal is without merit. Counsel has filed a brief pursuant to Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738, 87 S.Ct. 1396, 18 L.Ed.2d 493 (1967). Independent review of the entire record reveals that counsel’s assessment of the relative merit of the appeal is correct. Because independent examination of the entire record reveals no arguable issues of merit, counsel’s motion to withdraw is GRANTED, and [869] Leal’s conviction and sentence are AFFIRMED.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

PER CURIAM:

Chet Kaufman, appointed counsel for Jeremy Leal, has moved to withdraw from further representation of Leal, because, in his opinion, the appeal is without merit. Counsel has filed a brief pursuant to Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738, 87 S.Ct. 1396, 18 L.Ed.2d 493 (1967). Independent review of the entire record reveals that counsel’s assessment of the relative merit of the appeal is correct. Because independent examination of the entire record reveals no arguable issues of merit, counsel’s motion to withdraw is GRANTED, and [869] Leal’s conviction and sentence are AFFIRMED.

United States v. Leal, 177 F. App'x 868 (11th Cir. 2006).

Pincite

177 F. App'x 868 (United States v. Leal) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Opinion

Related