United States v. Lbawa Thomas
This text of United States v. Lbawa Thomas (United States v. Lbawa Thomas) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
United States Court of Appeals For the Eighth Circuit ___________________________
No. 24-2378 ___________________________
United States of America
lllllllllllllllllllllPlaintiff - Appellee
v.
Lbawa M. Thomas
lllllllllllllllllllllDefendant - Appellant ____________
Appeal from United States District Court for the Western District of Missouri - Kansas City ____________
Submitted: September 5, 2024 Filed: September 10, 2024 [Unpublished] ____________
Before GRUENDER, SHEPHERD, and ERICKSON, Circuit Judges. ____________
PER CURIAM.
Lbawa Thomas appeals after the district court revoked his supervised release and sentenced him to 3 months in prison. On appeal, Thomas argues that the district court erred by including a 2-year term of supervised release in the written judgment that was not orally pronounced at sentencing. Upon careful review, we conclude that the oral pronouncement of the sentence was ambiguous because, while the district court did not specifically state that it was imposing a new term of supervised release, it ordered Thomas to reside in a residential reentry center and abide by curfew requirements. See United States v. Mays, 993 F.3d 607, 622 (8th Cir. 2021) (while oral sentence controls over conflicting written judgment, mere imprecise language at a hearing will not negate the court’s obvious intent); United States v. Walker, 80 F.4th 880, 882-83 (8th Cir. 2023) (district court’s failure to specifically address conditions of supervised release which related to conditions that were orally pronounced was matter of mere oversight; vacating and remanding for resentencing to impose omitted conditions, giving defendant an opportunity to object).
Accordingly, because it appears that the omission may have been a mere oversight, we vacate the sentence and remand to the district court for resentencing, with clarification regarding its imposition of a new term of supervised release. ______________________________
-2-
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
United States v. Lbawa Thomas, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/united-states-v-lbawa-thomas-ca8-2024.