United States v. Lazo
Opinion
UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 10-6710
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,
Plaintiff – Appellee,
v.
MELBA NOELY LAZO,
Defendant – Appellant.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Virginia, at Alexandria. Leonie M. Brinkema, District Judge. (1:08-cr-00126-LMB-2)
Submitted: September 28, 2010 Decided: October 5, 2010
Before WILKINSON, SHEDD, and DAVIS, Circuit Judges.
Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Melba Noely Lazo, Appellant Pro Se. Daniel Joseph Grooms, III, Assistant United States Attorney, Alexandria, Virginia, for Appellee.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. PER CURIAM:
Melba Noely Lazo appeals the district court’s order
denying her “Reconsideration motion to reduce sentence minor
participation.” We have reviewed the record and find no
reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated
by the district court. United States v. Lazo, No. 1:08-cr-
00126-LMB-2 (E.D. Va. filed Apr. 22, 2010; entered Apr. 23,
2010). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and
legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials
before the court and argument would not aid the decisional
process.
AFFIRMED
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
United States v. Lazo (United States v. Lazo) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.