United States v. Lazo

Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit·Decided October 5, 2010·No. 10-6710·Unpublished

Opinion

UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 10-6710

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

Plaintiff – Appellee,

v.

MELBA NOELY LAZO,

Defendant – Appellant.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Virginia, at Alexandria. Leonie M. Brinkema, District Judge. (1:08-cr-00126-LMB-2)

Submitted: September 28, 2010 Decided: October 5, 2010

Before WILKINSON, SHEDD, and DAVIS, Circuit Judges.

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Melba Noely Lazo, Appellant Pro Se. Daniel Joseph Grooms, III, Assistant United States Attorney, Alexandria, Virginia, for Appellee.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. PER CURIAM:

Melba Noely Lazo appeals the district court’s order

denying her “Reconsideration motion to reduce sentence minor

participation.” We have reviewed the record and find no

reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated

by the district court. United States v. Lazo, No. 1:08-cr-

00126-LMB-2 (E.D. Va. filed Apr. 22, 2010; entered Apr. 23,

2010). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and

legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials

before the court and argument would not aid the decisional

process.

AFFIRMED

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

United States v. Lazo, (4th Cir. 2010).

United States v. Lazo (United States v. Lazo) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.