United States v. Layton

Ninth Circuit

United States v. Layton

665 F.2d 274, 1981 U.S. App. LEXIS 14066

CourtCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit

DecidedApril 22, 1981

DocketNo. 81-1210

StatusPublished

This text of 665 F.2d 274 (United States v. Layton) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

United States v. Layton, 665 F.2d 274, 1981 U.S. App. LEXIS 14066 (9th Cir. 1981).

Pincite

Opinion

ORDER

Before WRIGHT, KENNEDY and FAR-RIS, Circuit Judges.

Appellant seeks interlocutory review of the district court’s order denying his challenge to venue in that court, 519 F.Supp. 942. The Government, relying on United States v. Martin, 620 F.2d 237, 238-39 (10th Cir.), cert. denied sub nom. Stipe v. United States, 449 U.S. 890, 101 S.Ct. 248, 66 L.Ed.2d 116 (1980), has moved to dismiss the appeal for lack of jurisdiction. The appellant has responded, and he agrees that the order appealed from is not subject to interlocutory review.

We adopt the reasoning of Martin and grant the Government’s motion to dismiss for lack of jurisdiction.

The mandate shall issue forthwith.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI