United States v. Layton

665 F.2d 274, 1981 U.S. App. LEXIS 14066
Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit·Decided April 22, 1981·No. No. 81-1210·Published

Opinion

ORDER

Before WRIGHT, KENNEDY and FAR-RIS, Circuit Judges.

Appellant seeks interlocutory review of the district court’s order denying his challenge to venue in that court, 519 F.Supp. 942. The Government, relying on United States v. Martin, 620 F.2d 237, 238-39 (10th Cir.), cert. denied sub nom. Stipe v. United States, 449 U.S. 890, 101 S.Ct. 248, 66 L.Ed.2d 116 (1980), has moved to dismiss the appeal for lack of jurisdiction. The appellant has responded, and he agrees that the order appealed from is not subject to interlocutory review.

We adopt the reasoning of Martin and grant the Government’s motion to dismiss for lack of jurisdiction.

The mandate shall issue forthwith.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

United States v. Layton, 665 F.2d 274, 1981 U.S. App. LEXIS 14066 (9th Cir. 1981).

665 F.2d 274 (United States v. Layton) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

United States v. Layton
519 F. Supp. 942 (N.D. California, 1981)
United States v. Martin
620 F.2d 237 (Tenth Circuit, 1980)
Stipe v. United States
449 U.S. 890 (Supreme Court, 1980)
Imperial Distributors, Inc. v. United States
449 U.S. 891 (Supreme Court, 1980)