United States v. Lawson

Eleventh Circuit

United States v. Lawson

144 F. App'x 101

Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit·Decided September 21, 2005·No. No. 04-14905; D.C. Docket No. 04-00003-CR-3-WLS-1·Published

Opinion

PER CURIAM:

Thomas G. Ledford, appointed counsel for Donald Keith Lawson in this direct criminal appeal, has moved to withdraw from further representation of appellant and filed a brief pursuant to Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738, 87 S.Ct. 1396, 18 L.Ed.2d 493 (1967). Our independent review of the entire record reveals that counsel’s assessment of the relative merit of the appeal is correct. Because independent examination of the entire record reveals no arguable issues of merit, counsel’s motion to withdraw is GRANTED, and Lawson’s convictions and sentences are AFFIRMED.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

PER CURIAM:

Thomas G. Ledford, appointed counsel for Donald Keith Lawson in this direct criminal appeal, has moved to withdraw from further representation of appellant and filed a brief pursuant to Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738, 87 S.Ct. 1396, 18 L.Ed.2d 493 (1967). Our independent review of the entire record reveals that counsel’s assessment of the relative merit of the appeal is correct. Because independent examination of the entire record reveals no arguable issues of merit, counsel’s motion to withdraw is GRANTED, and Lawson’s convictions and sentences are AFFIRMED.

United States v. Lawson, 144 F. App'x 101 (11th Cir. 2005).

Pincite

144 F. App'x 101 (United States v. Lawson) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Opinion

Related