United States v. Lawrence W. Oliver

870 F.2d 658, 1989 U.S. App. LEXIS 2902, 1989 WL 25886
Procedural entryThis page is a short order in United States v. Lawrence W. Oliver. Read the opinion of the Court — 850 F.2d 693
Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit·Decided March 10, 1989·No. 88-4023·Unpublished

Opinion

870 F.2d 658

Unpublished Disposition
NOTICE: Sixth Circuit Rule 24(c) states that citation of unpublished dispositions is disfavored except for establishing res judicata, estoppel, or the law of the case and requires service of copies of cited unpublished dispositions of the Sixth Circuit.
UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee
v.
Lawrence W. OLIVER, Defendant-Appellant

No. 88-4023.

United States Court of Appeals, Sixth Circuit.

March 10, 1989.

Before MERRITT and DAVID A. NELSON, Circuit Judges, and LIVELY, Senior Circuit Judge

MERRITT, Circuit Judge.

The only issue asserted by appellant is that the Federal Sentencing Guidelines are unconstitutional in that they were the product of an unlawful delegation of the powers of Congress to the Sentencing Commission. The United States Supreme Court, however, in Mistretta v. United States, --- U.S. ----, 109 S.Ct. 2818 (Jan. 18, 1989), held that the guidelines were constitutional and did not result from an unlawful delegation. The decision of the District Court, therefore, is affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

United States v. Lawrence W. Oliver, 870 F.2d 658, 1989 U.S. App. LEXIS 2902, 1989 WL 25886 (6th Cir. 1989).

870 F.2d 658 (United States v. Lawrence W. Oliver) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related