United States v. Lawrence Neadle, Jr.

79 F.3d 14, 1996 U.S. App. LEXIS 9852, 1995 WL 831605

Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit·Decided March 25, 1996·No. 94-7417·Published·Cited by 2 cases

Opinion

ORDER AMENDING OPINION

IT IS ORDERED that the slip opinion in the above case, filed on December 19, 1995, 72 F.3d 1104 be amended as follows:

1. Please delete the second paragraph in Part LA of Judge Becker’s concurring and dissenting opinion, including footnote 1.

2. At the end of the third sentence in the first paragraph of Part I.A.1 of Judge Becker’s concurring and dissenting opinion (which reads “See USSG § 2F1.1(b).”), please add the following footnote: “Except where noted, my discussion is based on the 1988 Guidelines.”

/s/ Edward R. Becker EDWARD R. BECKER, Circuit Judge

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

ORDER AMENDING OPINION

IT IS ORDERED that the slip opinion in the above case, filed on December 19, 1995, 72 F.3d 1104 be amended as follows:

1. Please delete the second paragraph in Part LA of Judge Becker’s concurring and dissenting opinion, including footnote 1.

2. At the end of the third sentence in the first paragraph of Part I.A.1 of Judge Becker’s concurring and dissenting opinion (which reads “See USSG § 2F1.1(b).”), please add the following footnote: “Except where noted, my discussion is based on the 1988 Guidelines.”

/s/ Edward R. Becker EDWARD R. BECKER, Circuit Judge

United States v. Lawrence Neadle, Jr., 79 F.3d 14, 1996 U.S. App. LEXIS 9852, 1995 WL 831605 (3d Cir. 1996).

Pincite

79 F.3d 14 (United States v. Lawrence Neadle, Jr.) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

United States v. Jimenez

513 F.3d 62 (Third Circuit, 2008)

United States v. Melvin Robinson, A/K/A Sweets Melvin Robinson

167 F.3d 824 (Third Circuit, 1999)

Opinion

Related