United States v. Lawrence Kearney
659 F.2d 1203, 212 U.S. App. D.C. 319, 1981 U.S. App. LEXIS 11267
CourtCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit
DecidedJuly 20, 1981
Docket19-5104
StatusPublished
Cited by10 cases
This text of 659 F.2d 1203 (United States v. Lawrence Kearney) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Bluebook
United States v. Lawrence Kearney, 659 F.2d 1203, 212 U.S. App. D.C. 319, 1981 U.S. App. LEXIS 11267 (D.C. Cir. 1981).
Opinions
ORDER
On consideration of the motion for appointment of counsel referred from the District Court, it is
ORDERED by the Court that the aforesaid motion is granted.
The dissenting opinion of Circuit Judge MacKINNON is attached.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Diamen v. United States
725 A.2d 501 (District of Columbia Court of Appeals, 1999)
Barry v. Posi-Seal International, Inc.
647 A.2d 1031 (Connecticut Appellate Court, 1994)
Henderson v. Industrial Mut. Ass'n, Inc.
758 F.2d 652 (Sixth Circuit, 1985)
Powell v. United States
485 A.2d 596 (District of Columbia Court of Appeals, 1984)
United States v. Lawrence Kearney
682 F.2d 214 (D.C. Circuit, 1982)
Louis John Bean v. United States
679 F.2d 683 (Seventh Circuit, 1982)
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Bluebook (online)
659 F.2d 1203, 212 U.S. App. D.C. 319, 1981 U.S. App. LEXIS 11267, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/united-states-v-lawrence-kearney-cadc-1981.