United States v. Lawrence Kearney
659 F.2d 1203, 212 U.S. App. D.C. 319, 1981 U.S. App. LEXIS 11267
Opinions
ORDER
On consideration of the motion for appointment of counsel referred from the District Court, it is
ORDERED by the Court that the aforesaid motion is granted.
The dissenting opinion of Circuit Judge MacKINNON is attached.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
United States v. Lawrence Kearney, 659 F.2d 1203, 212 U.S. App. D.C. 319, 1981 U.S. App. LEXIS 11267 (D.C. Cir. 1981).
659 F.2d 1203 (United States v. Lawrence Kearney) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
Diamen v. United States
725 A.2d 501 (District of Columbia Court of Appeals, 1999)
Barry v. Posi-Seal International, Inc.
647 A.2d 1031 (Connecticut Appellate Court, 1994)
Henderson v. Industrial Mut. Ass'n, Inc.
758 F.2d 652 (Sixth Circuit, 1985)
Powell v. United States
485 A.2d 596 (District of Columbia Court of Appeals, 1984)
United States v. Lawrence Kearney
682 F.2d 214 (D.C. Circuit, 1982)
Louis John Bean v. United States
679 F.2d 683 (Seventh Circuit, 1982)