United States v. Lawrence Joseph Rondinone

Ninth Circuit

United States v. Lawrence Joseph Rondinone

403 F.2d 713

CourtCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit

DecidedNovember 18, 1968

Docket22714_1

StatusPublished

This text of 403 F.2d 713 (United States v. Lawrence Joseph Rondinone) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

United States v. Lawrence Joseph Rondinone, 403 F.2d 713 (9th Cir. 1968).

Pincite

Opinion

PER CURIAM:

Lawrence Joseph Rondinone appeals from his conviction, on a jury verdict, of having in his possession, on or about July 1, 1967, nine twenty dollar Federal Reserve Notes, each bearing serial number DO 6860402A, then knowing the obligations to be falsely made, forged and counterfeited, in violation of 18 U.S.C. § 472 (1964).

On this appeal, defendant argues only that the evidence is insufficient to support the conviction. We hold that the evidence is adequate.

Affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

PER CURIAM:

Lawrence Joseph Rondinone appeals from his conviction, on a jury verdict, of having in his possession, on or about July 1, 1967, nine twenty dollar Federal Reserve Notes, each bearing serial number DO 6860402A, then knowing the obligations to be falsely made, forged and counterfeited, in violation of 18 U.S.C. § 472 (1964).

On this appeal, defendant argues only that the evidence is insufficient to support the conviction. We hold that the evidence is adequate.

Affirmed.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

403 F.2d 713, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/united-states-v-lawrence-joseph-rondinone-ca9-1968.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack