United States v. Lawrence Gonzalez, Jr.
This text of United States v. Lawrence Gonzalez, Jr. (United States v. Lawrence Gonzalez, Jr.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
FILED NOT FOR PUBLICATION MAR 16 2017
MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS U.S. COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, No. 16-10307
Plaintiff-Appellee, D.C. No. 4:14-cr-00095-JGZ
v. MEMORANDUM* LAWRENCE GONZALEZ, Jr.,
Defendant-Appellant.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of Arizona Jennifer G. Zipps, District Judge, Presiding
Submitted March 8, 2017**
Before: SILVERMAN, W. FLETCHER, and OWENS, Circuit Judges.
Lawrence Gonzalez, Jr., appeals from the revocation of supervised release
and the 12-month sentence imposed upon revocation. Pursuant to Anders v.
California, 386 U.S. 738 (1967), Gonzalez’s counsel has filed a brief stating that
* This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3. ** The panel unanimously concludes this case is suitable for decision without oral argument. See Fed. R. App. P. 34(a)(2). there are no grounds for relief, along with a motion to withdraw as counsel of
record.
Because Gonzalez has fully served his sentence and is not subject to a term
of supervised release, we dismiss this appeal as moot. See Spencer v. Kemna, 523
U.S. 1, 14 (1998); United States v. Palomba, 182 F.3d 1121, 1123 (9th Cir. 1999).
Counsel’s motion to withdraw is GRANTED.
DISMISSED.
2 16-10307
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
United States v. Lawrence Gonzalez, Jr., Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/united-states-v-lawrence-gonzalez-jr-ca9-2017.