United States v. Lawrence Gonzalez, Jr.

Opinion

FILED NOT FOR PUBLICATION MAR 16 2017

MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS U.S. COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, No. 16-10307

Plaintiff-Appellee, D.C. No. 4:14-cr-00095-JGZ

v. MEMORANDUM* LAWRENCE GONZALEZ, Jr.,

Defendant-Appellant.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of Arizona Jennifer G. Zipps, District Judge, Presiding

Submitted March 8, 2017**

Before: SILVERMAN, W. FLETCHER, and OWENS, Circuit Judges.

Lawrence Gonzalez, Jr., appeals from the revocation of supervised release

and the 12-month sentence imposed upon revocation. Pursuant to Anders v.

California, 386 U.S. 738 (1967), Gonzalez’s counsel has filed a brief stating that

* This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3. ** The panel unanimously concludes this case is suitable for decision without oral argument. See Fed. R. App. P. 34(a)(2). there are no grounds for relief, along with a motion to withdraw as counsel of

record.

Because Gonzalez has fully served his sentence and is not subject to a term

of supervised release, we dismiss this appeal as moot. See Spencer v. Kemna, 523

U.S. 1, 14 (1998); United States v. Palomba, 182 F.3d 1121, 1123 (9th Cir. 1999).

Counsel’s motion to withdraw is GRANTED.

DISMISSED.

2 16-10307