United States v. Lawrence

Procedural entryThis page is a short order in United States v. Lawrence. Read the opinion of the Court — 276 F.3d 193
Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit·Decided June 20, 2002·No. 01-31239·Unpublished

Opinion

IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

No. 01-31239 Conference Calendar

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

Plaintiff-Appellee,

versus

TREVOR ROHAN LAWRENCE,

Defendant-Appellant.

-------------------- Appeal from the United States District Court for the Western District of Louisiana USDC No. 01-CR-50014-ALL -------------------- June 19, 2002

Before HIGGINBOTHAM, DAVIS, and EMILIO M. GARZA, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM:*

Trevor Rohan Lawrence appeals the 46-month sentence imposed

by the district court following his conviction on a guilty plea

to a charge of possession with intent to distribute 100 kilograms

or more of marijuana.

Lawrence contends that the district court did not make a

finding at sentencing on the issue whether his role in the

offense was minor or minimal. The district court overruled

Lawrence’s objection to the presentence report. The record

reflects that the district court adequately resolved the disputed

* Pursuant to 5TH CIR. R. 47.5, the court has determined that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5TH CIR. R. 47.5.4. No. 01-31239 -2-

issue and provided a basis for its resolution. United States v.

Piazza, 959 F.2d 33, 37 (5th Cir. 1992).

Lawrence contends also that the district court’s denial of a

reduction for a minor or minimal role in the offense was clear

error. We review a district court’s finding on a defendant’s

role in the offense for clear error. Burton v. United States,

237 F.3d 490, 503 (5th Cir. 2000).

Lawrence was transporting over 476 kilograms of marijuana

from California to Ohio. He admitted knowledge that the truck

contained at least 200 pounds of marijuana. Lawrence’s admitted

role as a courier does not necessarily make his role in the

offense minor or minimal. See United States v. Rojas, 868 F.2d

1409, 1410 (5th Cir. 1989); United States v. Gallegos, 868 F.2d

711, 713 (5th Cir. 1989). Accordingly, the judgment of the

district court is AFFIRMED.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

United States v. Lawrence, (5th Cir. 2002).

United States v. Lawrence (United States v. Lawrence) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

United States v. Luis Torres Rojas
868 F.2d 1409 (Fifth Circuit, 1989)
United States v. Kathy Sue Piazza
959 F.2d 33 (Fifth Circuit, 1992)
Burton v. United States
237 F.3d 490 (Fifth Circuit, 2000)