United States v. Lavon Thomas Laurine, AKA Michael Anthony Elliott
This text of 73 F.3d 371 (United States v. Lavon Thomas Laurine, AKA Michael Anthony Elliott) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
73 F.3d 371
NOTICE: Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3 provides that dispositions other than opinions or orders designated for publication are not precedential and should not be cited except when relevant under the doctrines of law of the case, res judicata, or collateral estoppel.
UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee,
v.
Lavon Thomas LAURINE, aka Michael Anthony Elliott,
Defendant-Appellant.
No. 94-30162.
United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit.
Submitted Dec. 19, 1995.*
Decided Dec. 27, 1995.
Before: SNEED, TROTT and HAWKINS, Circuit Judges.
MEMORANDUM**
Lavon Thomas Laurine appeals his sentence under the Sentencing Guidelines imposed following his guilty plea to possession with intent to distribute cocaine base and cocaine. He contends that he was entitled to a downward departure based on extraordinary childhood abuse. "The record fails to suggest that the district court was under the impression that it could not depart downward if it chose to do so." United States v. Heim, 15 F.3d 830, 833 (9th Cir.), cert. denied, 115 S.Ct. 95 (1994). We lack jurisdiction to review the district court's discretionary refusal to depart downward. See id.
DISMISSED.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
73 F.3d 371, 1995 U.S. App. LEXIS 40872, 1995 WL 762183, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/united-states-v-lavon-thomas-laurine-aka-michael-anthony-elliott-ca9-1995.