United States v. Lavan Cortez-Johnson
This text of United States v. Lavan Cortez-Johnson (United States v. Lavan Cortez-Johnson) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
United States Court of Appeals For the Eighth Circuit ___________________________
No. 20-3078 ___________________________
United States of America
lllllllllllllllllllllPlaintiff - Appellee
v.
Lavan Cortez-Johnson, also known as Gata
lllllllllllllllllllllDefendant - Appellant ____________
Appeal from United States District Court for the Eastern District of Missouri - Cape Girardeau ____________
Submitted: September 20, 2021 Filed: September 27, 2021 [Unpublished] ____________
Before SMITH, Chief Judge, ARNOLD and GRUENDER, Circuit Judges. ____________
PER CURIAM.
After Lavan Johnson pleaded guilty to conspiring to distribute methamphetamine, see 21 U.S.C. §§ 841(a)(1), (b)(1)(A), and 846, and to distributing methamphetamine, see id. § 841(a)(1), (b)(1)(B), the district court1 deemed him a
1 The Honorable Stephen N. Limbaugh, Jr., United States District Judge for the Eastern District of Missouri. career offender and sentenced him to 180 months' imprisonment. Under § 4B1.1(a) of the Sentencing Guidelines, a career offender includes a defendant who stands convicted of a felony controlled substance offense and has two prior felony convictions for controlled substance offenses. The district court determined that Johnson had two such predicate convictions, but he maintains that one of them, a Tennessee conviction for possessing a controlled substance with intent to deliver or sell it, see Tenn. Code Ann. § 39-17-417(a)(4), does not qualify as a predicate.
Johnson concedes, however, that a prior decision of our court forecloses his argument, see United States v. Coleman, 977 F.3d 666, 670–71 (8th Cir. 2020), and says he is bringing this appeal merely to preserve his contention in case the Supreme Court or our en banc court overturns that case. Bound as we are by a prior decision, see United States v. Green, 946 F.3d 433, 440 (8th Cir. 2019), we affirm the judgment of the district court.
Affirmed. ______________________________
-2-
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
United States v. Lavan Cortez-Johnson, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/united-states-v-lavan-cortez-johnson-ca8-2021.