United States v. Laurent

Fourth Circuit

United States v. Laurent

173 F. App'x 231

Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit·Decided March 29, 2006·No. 05-4793·Unpublished

Opinion

PER CURIAM:

Andres Laurent appeals the district court’s order denying his motion for return of forfeited property. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. See United *232 States v. Laurent, No. CR-08-372 (E.D.Va. July 20, 2005). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

PER CURIAM:

Andres Laurent appeals the district court’s order denying his motion for return of forfeited property. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. See United *232 States v. Laurent, No. CR-08-372 (E.D.Va. July 20, 2005). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED

United States v. Laurent, 173 F. App'x 231 (4th Cir. 2006).

Pincite

173 F. App'x 231 (United States v. Laurent) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.