United States v. Laura Elena Esquer-Rivera, United States of America v. Anacleto Nava-Bibayoff

542 F.2d 521, 1976 U.S. App. LEXIS 7061
Procedural entryThis page is a short order in United States v. Laura Elena Esquer-Rivera, United States of America v. Anacleto Nava-Bibayoff. Read the opinion of the Court — 500 F.2d 313
Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit·Decided September 20, 1976·No. 74-1110·Published

Opinion

542 F.2d 521

UNITED STATES of America, Appellee,
v.
Laura Elena ESQUER-RIVERA, Appellant.
UNITED STATES of America, Appellee,
v.
Anacleto NAVA-BIBAYOFF, Appellant.

Nos. 74-1110, 74-1099.

United States Court of Appeals,
Ninth Circuit.

Sept. 20, 1976.

Michael J. McCabe (argued), of Federal Defenders, San Diego, Cal., for appellants.

James W. Meyers (argued), Asst. U. S. Atty., San Diego, Cal., for appellee.

Before ELY and GOODWIN, Circuit Judges, and EAST,* District Judge.

The court now being fully advised, the petition for rehearing filed July 24, 1975, is allowed; the opinion filed July 1, 1974 (500 F.2d 313), is withdrawn; and the judgment of the district court is affirmed on the authority of United States v. Martinez-Fuerte et al., --- U.S. ----, 96 S.Ct. 3074, 49 L.Ed.2d --- (1976), reversing 514 F.2d 308 (9th Cir. 1975).

*

The Honorable William G. East, United States District Judge for the District of Oregon, sitting by designation

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

United States v. Laura Elena Esquer-Rivera, United States of America v. Anacleto Nava-Bibayoff, 542 F.2d 521, 1976 U.S. App. LEXIS 7061 (9th Cir. 1976).

542 F.2d 521 (United States v. Laura Elena Esquer-Rivera, United States of America v. Anacleto Nava-Bibayoff) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related