United States v. Laura Elena Esquer-Rivera, United States of America v. Anacleto Nava-Bibayoff
This text of 542 F.2d 521 (United States v. Laura Elena Esquer-Rivera, United States of America v. Anacleto Nava-Bibayoff) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
UNITED STATES of America, Appellee,
v.
Laura Elena ESQUER-RIVERA, Appellant.
UNITED STATES of America, Appellee,
v.
Anacleto NAVA-BIBAYOFF, Appellant.
Nos. 74-1110, 74-1099.
United States Court of Appeals,
Ninth Circuit.
Sept. 20, 1976.
Michael J. McCabe (argued), of Federal Defenders, San Diego, Cal., for appellants.
James W. Meyers (argued), Asst. U. S. Atty., San Diego, Cal., for appellee.
Before ELY and GOODWIN, Circuit Judges, and EAST,* District Judge.
The court now being fully advised, the petition for rehearing filed July 24, 1975, is allowed; the opinion filed July 1, 1974 (500 F.2d 313), is withdrawn; and the judgment of the district court is affirmed on the authority of United States v. Martinez-Fuerte et al., --- U.S. ----, 96 S.Ct. 3074, 49 L.Ed.2d --- (1976), reversing 514 F.2d 308 (9th Cir. 1975).
The Honorable William G. East, United States District Judge for the District of Oregon, sitting by designation
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
542 F.2d 521, 1976 U.S. App. LEXIS 7061, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/united-states-v-laura-elena-esquer-rivera-united-states-of-america-v-ca9-1976.