United States v. Lau Sing

Second Circuit

United States v. Lau Sing

304 F.2d 267, 1962 U.S. App. LEXIS 4798

CourtCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit

DecidedJune 14, 1962

Docket27170

StatusPublished

This text of 304 F.2d 267 (United States v. Lau Sing) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

United States v. Lau Sing, 304 F.2d 267, 1962 U.S. App. LEXIS 4798 (2d Cir. 1962).

Pincite

Opinion

304 F.2d 267

UNITED STATES of America, Appellee,
v.
LAU SING, Appellant.

No. 386, Docket 27170.

United States Court of Appeals Second Circuit.

Argued June 14, 1962.
Decided June 14, 1962.

Daniel H. Greenberg, New York City, for appellant.

Jonathan L. Rosner, New York City (Robert M. Morgenthau, U.S. Atty. for Southern District of New York, Arnold N. Enker, Asst. U.S. Atty., of counsel), for appellee.

Before FRIENDLY, KAUFMAN and HAYS, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM.

We affirm the conviction in open court. The claims of error, to wit, the admission of statements of co-conspirators and the receipt of narcotics paraphernalia allegedly obtained through an illegal search and seizure, are wholly without merit.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI