United States v. Lathrop

Ninth Circuit

United States v. Lathrop

199 F.2d 954

Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit·Decided November 14, 1952·No. 13507_1·Published·Cited by 2 cases

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

The appellant United States has not conformed to our rules 19(1) and 19(6) nor to Rule 73(g) of Federal Rules of Civil Procedure, 28 U.S.C.A., and has tendered no adequate excuse or reason. Therefore, the petition of appellee to dismiss the appeal, heretofore submitted, is granted. See this court’s decisions and opinions in: United States v. Gallagher, 9 Cir., 1945, 151 F.2d 556; Markham v. Kallimanis, 9 Cir., 1945, 151 F.2d 145; United States v. Tamotsu Fujisaki, 9 Cir., 1952, 198 F.2d 747.

Appeal dismissed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

PER CURIAM.

The appellant United States has not conformed to our rules 19(1) and 19(6) nor to Rule 73(g) of Federal Rules of Civil Procedure, 28 U.S.C.A., and has tendered no adequate excuse or reason. Therefore, the petition of appellee to dismiss the appeal, heretofore submitted, is granted. See this court’s decisions and opinions in: United States v. Gallagher, 9 Cir., 1945, 151 F.2d 556; Markham v. Kallimanis, 9 Cir., 1945, 151 F.2d 145; United States v. Tamotsu Fujisaki, 9 Cir., 1952, 198 F.2d 747.

Appeal dismissed.

United States v. Lathrop, 199 F.2d 954 (9th Cir. 1952).

Pincite

199 F.2d 954 (United States v. Lathrop) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Opinion

Related