United States v. Lathrop

Ninth Circuit

United States v. Lathrop

199 F.2d 954

CourtCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit

DecidedNovember 14, 1952

Docket13507_1

StatusPublished

Cited by2 cases

This text of 199 F.2d 954 (United States v. Lathrop) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

United States v. Lathrop, 199 F.2d 954 (9th Cir. 1952).

Pincite

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

The appellant United States has not conformed to our rules 19(1) and 19(6) nor to Rule 73(g) of Federal Rules of Civil Procedure, 28 U.S.C.A., and has tendered no adequate excuse or reason. Therefore, the petition of appellee to dismiss the appeal, heretofore submitted, is granted. See this court’s decisions and opinions in: United States v. Gallagher, 9 Cir., 1945, 151 F.2d 556; Markham v. Kallimanis, 9 Cir., 1945, 151 F.2d 145; United States v. Tamotsu Fujisaki, 9 Cir., 1952, 198 F.2d 747.

Appeal dismissed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

PER CURIAM.

The appellant United States has not conformed to our rules 19(1) and 19(6) nor to Rule 73(g) of Federal Rules of Civil Procedure, 28 U.S.C.A., and has tendered no adequate excuse or reason. Therefore, the petition of appellee to dismiss the appeal, heretofore submitted, is granted. See this court’s decisions and opinions in: United States v. Gallagher, 9 Cir., 1945, 151 F.2d 556; Markham v. Kallimanis, 9 Cir., 1945, 151 F.2d 145; United States v. Tamotsu Fujisaki, 9 Cir., 1952, 198 F.2d 747.

Appeal dismissed.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

199 F.2d 954, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/united-states-v-lathrop-ca9-1952.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack