United States v. Larson
This text of 95 F. App'x 252 (United States v. Larson) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
MEMORANDUM
John Larson appeals his guilty-plea conviction and 42-month sentence for two counts of securities fraud, and two counts of mail fraud, in violation of 15 U.S.C. §§ 783(b), and 78ff, 17 C.F.R. 240.10b-5, and 18 U.S.C. § 1341.
Pursuant to Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738, 87 S.Ct. 1396, 18 L.Ed.2d 493 (1967), counsel for Larson has filed a brief stating there are no grounds for relief, and a motion to withdraw as counsel of record. Larson filed a pro se supplemental brief and the government has filed an answering brief arguing dismissal based on an appeal waiver provision in Larson’s plea agreement.
Our independent review of the record pursuant to Penson v. Ohio, 488 U.S. 75, 83, 109 S.Ct. 346, 102 L.Ed.2d 300 (1988), discloses no grounds for relief. Counsel’s motion to withdraw is GRANTED and the appeal is DISMISSED.
This disposition is not appropriate for publication and may not be cited to or by the courts of this circuit except as provided by Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
95 F. App'x 252, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/united-states-v-larson-ca9-2004.