United States v. Larry Wills

310 F. App'x 61
CourtCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit
DecidedFebruary 17, 2009
Docket07-3904
StatusUnpublished

This text of 310 F. App'x 61 (United States v. Larry Wills) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
United States v. Larry Wills, 310 F. App'x 61 (8th Cir. 2009).

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

Larry Wills pleaded guilty to eight charges involving fraud and money laundering. He now appeals his 48-month prison sentence, arguing that remand is required because the district court 1 did not specifically address the 18 U.S.C. § 3553(a) factors or explain the chosen sentence. Wills made no objection to this at sentencing. The record reveals that before imposing sentence, the district court heard statements from both counsel and adopted the parties’ agreed-upon advisory Guidelines imprisonment range of 46-57 months. We are thus satisfied that the court had a reasoned basis for the selected sentence, see Rita v. United States, 551 U.S. 338, 127 S.Ct. 2456, 2468, 168 L.Ed.2d 203 (2007), and there is no indication that Wills would have received a lower sentence had the court more explicitly explained its decision, see United States v. Pate, 518 F.3d 972, 975 (8th Cir.2008). Accordingly, we affirm.

1

. The Honorable Scott O. Wright, United States District Judge for the Western District of Missouri.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Rita v. United States
551 U.S. 338 (Supreme Court, 2007)
United States v. Pate
518 F.3d 972 (Eighth Circuit, 2008)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
310 F. App'x 61, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/united-states-v-larry-wills-ca8-2009.