United States v. Larry Sinclair Williams-El

Fourth Circuit

United States v. Larry Sinclair Williams-El

60 F.3d 826, 1995 U.S. App. LEXIS 24950, 1995 WL 382083

CourtCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit

DecidedJune 28, 1995

Docket95-6474

StatusPublished

This text of 60 F.3d 826 (United States v. Larry Sinclair Williams-El) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

United States v. Larry Sinclair Williams-El, 60 F.3d 826, 1995 U.S. App. LEXIS 24950, 1995 WL 382083 (4th Cir. 1995).

Pincite

Opinion

60 F.3d 826
NOTICE: Fourth Circuit Local Rule 36(c) states that citation of unpublished dispositions is disfavored except for establishing res judicata, estoppel, or the law of the case and requires service of copies of cited unpublished dispositions of the Fourth Circuit.

UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff--Appellee,
v.
Larry Sinclair WILLIAMS-EL, Defendant--Appellant.

No. 95-6474.

United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit.

Submitted: May 18, 1995.
Decided: June 28, 1995.

Larry Sinclair Williams-El, Appellant Pro Se. John Patrick Rowley, III, OFFICE OF THE UNITED STATES ATTORNEY, Alexandria, VA, for Appellee.

Before NIEMEYER and WILLIAMS, Circuit Judges, and BUTZNER, Senior Circuit Judge.

PER CURIAM:

Larry Sinclair Williams-El appeals from the district court's order denying his post-conviction discovery motion in which he seeks a presentence report, witness protection program psychiatric reports, witness protection program polygram test results, and sentencing transcripts, all pertaining to a government witness who testified against Williams-El in his criminal trial. Because Williams-El has no litigation pending in the district court in which to file a discovery request, we affirm.* We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED.

*

In any event, Williams-El is not entitled to the information which he seeks

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

60 F.3d 826
NOTICE: Fourth Circuit Local Rule 36(c) states that citation of unpublished dispositions is disfavored except for establishing res judicata, estoppel, or the law of the case and requires service of copies of cited unpublished dispositions of the Fourth Circuit.

UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff--Appellee,
v.
Larry Sinclair WILLIAMS-EL, Defendant--Appellant.

No. 95-6474.

United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit.

Submitted: May 18, 1995.
Decided: June 28, 1995.

Larry Sinclair Williams-El, Appellant Pro Se. John Patrick Rowley, III, OFFICE OF THE UNITED STATES ATTORNEY, Alexandria, VA, for Appellee.

Before NIEMEYER and WILLIAMS, Circuit Judges, and BUTZNER, Senior Circuit Judge.

PER CURIAM:

Larry Sinclair Williams-El appeals from the district court's order denying his post-conviction discovery motion in which he seeks a presentence report, witness protection program psychiatric reports, witness protection program polygram test results, and sentencing transcripts, all pertaining to a government witness who testified against Williams-El in his criminal trial. Because Williams-El has no litigation pending in the district court in which to file a discovery request, we affirm.* We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED.

*

In any event, Williams-El is not entitled to the information which he seeks

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

60 F.3d 826, 1995 U.S. App. LEXIS 24950, 1995 WL 382083, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/united-states-v-larry-sinclair-williams-el-ca4-1995.