United States v. Larry P. Strang
This text of 25 F.3d 1052 (United States v. Larry P. Strang) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
25 F.3d 1052
NOTICE: Sixth Circuit Rule 24(c) states that citation of unpublished dispositions is disfavored except for establishing res judicata, estoppel, or the law of the case and requires service of copies of cited unpublished dispositions of the Sixth Circuit.
UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee,
v.
Larry P. STRANG, Defendant-Appellant.
No. 93-3838.
United States Court of Appeals, Sixth Circuit.
May 11, 1994.
Before: NORRIS and DAUGHTREY, Circuit Judges; and GILMORE, Senior District Judge.*
ORDER
This cause having come on to be heard upon the record, the briefs and the oral argument of the parties, and upon due consideration thereof, the court finds that there is substantial evidence to support the verdict of the jury and that no prejudicial error has intervened.
Accordingly, it is ORDERED that the judgment of the district court be and it hereby is affirmed.
The Honorable Horace W. Gilmore, Senior U.S. District Judge for the Eastern District of Michigan, sitting by designation
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
25 F.3d 1052, 1994 U.S. App. LEXIS 21085, 1994 WL 182069, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/united-states-v-larry-p-strang-ca6-1994.