United States v. Larry Haney
This text of 157 F. App'x 954 (United States v. Larry Haney) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
Larry Haney appeals the district court’s 1 denial of his motion to expunge his criminal record and its refusal to reconsider the denial. We cannot say that the district court abused its discretion in concluding that Haney’s case did not present unusual or exceptional circumstances warranting the extraordinary remedy of expungement, or in declining to reconsider the denial of relief. See Schinzing v. Mid-States Stainless, Inc., 415 F.3d 807, 813 (8th Cir.2005); Geary v. United States, 901 F.2d 679, 679-80 (8th Cir.1990); United States v. Bagley, 899 F.2d 707, 708 (8th Cir.), cert. denied, 498 U.S. 938, 111 S.Ct. 343, 112 L.Ed.2d 307 (1990). Accordingly, we affirm. See 8th Cir. R. 47B.
. The Honorable George Howard, Jr., United States District Judge for the Eastern District of Arkansas.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
157 F. App'x 954, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/united-states-v-larry-haney-ca8-2005.